Mona Lisa’s Other Secret—Where the Portrait Was Painted—May Have Been Solved by an Art Historian Using Drone Imagery

Digital reconstruction matches a bridge in Tuscany to the one in Leonardo's painting.

Leonardo da Vinci, Mona Lisa. Photo by VCG Wilson/Corbis via Getty Images.

It may well be the best known painting of all time, but mysteries still lurk behind the famous Mona Lisa smile. One longstanding historical dispute has been over the identity of the bridge in the background of Leonardo da Vinci’s celebrated portrait.

If scholars are able to reach an agreement on the matter, they would be able to pinpoint where exactly the painting was made.

Now, the Italian art historian Silvano Vinceti has put forward a new theory, according to the Guardian. He has claimed to be completely certain that the structure is the Romito di Laterina bridge not far from the town of Arezzo in Tuscany, which he studied using a drone.

The Etruscan-Roman era structure on the Arno river is now just a ruin, with only one of its arches remaining. Archival documents once owned by the Medici family, however, have shown that in the early 16th century it was a busy shortcut between the two banks. Other historical papers had also shown that da Vinci spent some periods staying with his uncle in the nearby town of Fiesole.

“We know he traveled through this part of Tuscany in the early 1500s—there is no doubt about that,” Vinceti told a press conference in Rome.

Vinceti has made a digital reconstruction of the bridge and, by measuring the width of the river and the length of each arch, has also determined that it must have originally had four arches, just like the bridge from the Renaissance masterpiece.

It appears that Vinceti considers himself to be a bit of a sleuth when it comes to solving art-historical mysteries, at least according to his Twitter bio. He has already made several previous claims about Leonardo’s painting, including that it was modeled on the artist’s male apprentice and lover Salai, and that the sitter contains tiny hidden symbols in her eyes that indicate the polymath’s interest in mysticism.

 

More Trending Stories:  

The Smithsonian National Museum of African Art’s Director Has Resigned After Less Than Two Years, Citing ‘Resistance and Backlash’ 

‘We’re Not All Ikea-Loving Minimalists’: Historian and Author Michael Diaz-Griffith on the Resurgence of Young Antique Collectors 

The First Auction of Late Billionaire Heidi Horten’s Controversial Jewelry Proves Wildly Successful, Raking in $156 Million 

An Airbnb Host Got More Than They Bargained for with a Guest’s Offbeat Art Swap—and the Mystery Has Gone Viral on TikTok 

Not Patriarchal Art History, But Art ‘Herstory’: Judy Chicago on Why She Devoted Her New Show to 80 Women Artists Who Inspired Her 

An Artist Asked ChatGPT How to Make a Popular Memecoin. The Result Is ‘TurboToad,’ and People Are Betting Millions of Dollars on It 

An Elderly Man Spray-Painted a Miriam Cahn Painting at a Paris Museum After Right-Wing Attempts to Censor It Failed 

The Netflix Series ‘Transatlantic’ Dramatizes the Effort to Evacuate Artists From France During World War II. Here’s What Actually Happened in Real Life 

 


Follow Artnet News on Facebook:


Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward.
Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

You are currently logged into this Artnet News Pro account on another device. Please log off from any other devices, and then reload this page continue. To find out if you are eligible for an Artnet News Pro group subscription, please contact [email protected]. Standard subscriptions can be purchased on the subscription page.

Log In