Art Burns: Artists Pick the 10 Most Brutal Reviews They’ve Ever Received in a New Book of Negative Criticism
"Bad Reviews" is latest, non-commercial release from artist Aleksandra Mir's Retrospective Press.
A scathing review can be hard for any artist to face. But 150 artists, some of them active since the 1960s, did just that, contributing the harshest criticism they’ve weathered to Bad Reviews, the latest, non-commercial book released from artist Aleksandra Mir’s Retrospective Press.
Bad Reviews elegizes the lost art of the negative review, subtly asking if art writing has gone soft. The critics in this volume pull no punches, however, making unfavorable comparisons between lesser-known artists and their more famous peers, and throwing out that ever-popular accusation of the vanity project.
“Key for this conversation is the role discourse plays in our current understanding of art, and—more pointedly—our grasp of whatever similarities and differences there might be between the historical models of criticism and contemporary online feeds of social media,” professor Tim Griffin writes in his introductory essay.
Ed Ruscha, Mickalene Thomas, and other superstars participated in Bad Reviews, which was seven years in the making, sharing writing that hails from sources as disparate as Twitter and the New York Times. Emails from the artists about their contributions are included, often with extra commentary about how deep the barbs stung. For example, Robert Longo says Roberta Smith’s hot takes derailed him, and Carolee Schneemann reminds the archivists that there are even meaner words about her out there.
Bad Review is not for sale—instead, the book has been distributed to participating artists and a selection of libraries and universities, for scholarship’s sake. Artnet News took a peek and rounded up our ten favorite roasts to keep you warm as the seasons change.
“10th Street, except for an occasional high spot, is only second-rate Madison Avenue, a parasite on, rather than a supplement to, art movements well established commercially uptown.”
—John Canaday, “Good-By Forever, a Final Sad Farewell to Tenth Street,” New York Times, May 19, 1963
“Fluff. Kid stuff. Taking low to no risks, this chicken shit’s so equivocal it can’t be evaluated. Success does not mean we didn’t fail because we never tried.”
—Geoffrey Cruickshank-Hagenbuckle and Miyuki Tsushima, “Slater Bradley: The Abandonments” at Team Gallery, for The Brooklyn Rail, December 23, 2006.
“Ms. Minter seems to be flirting with the idea that there is something glamorous as well as perverse about the sexual obsessions she chronicles; perhaps she wants to be the Camille Paglia of the visual arts.”
—Pepe Karmel, on Marilyn Minter at Max Protetch Gallery, for New York Times, January 13, 1995
“So she defaced Old Glory to take a cheap shot at President Trump? How avant-garde.”
—Todd Starnes, “University of Kansas Flies Defaced American Flag on Campus (On Purpose!),” review of “Pledges of Allegiance” at the Spencer Museum of Art, for Fox News, July 11, 2018
“Both Acconci and Rauschenberg, whose ‘combine’ technique Schneemann embraces, invoke an evasive strategy totally alien to her confrontational ethic: they implicate the audience, while she implicates herself with numerous self-portraits… if Rauschenberg repeats an image he does so for compositional reasons, not, as Schneemann does, for obsessional ones.”
—Jeanne Silverthorne, on Carolee Schneemann’s work at Max Hutchinson Gallery, for Artforum (New York), December 1983
“If Longo hadn’t come along, his art could almost have been plotted on a computer, or dreamed up by a team of artists, designers and technological wizards not unlike the one Longo himself oversees in the production of his work.”
—Roberta Smith, “Once a Wunderking, Now Robert ‘Long Ago’?” review of Robert Longo at LACMA, for New York Times, October 29, 1989
“when i was a kid i thought maybe american apartheid would slowly change
and now we have a black president who does everything white presidents do
he does everything just like them, all his policies are the same—he’s like colin powell
and in the 1990s i felt like things could change, maybe
but now i see white thinking’s not changing and this exhibit and the exhibits at every other museum in the city show this…”
—Sesshu Foster, “review of ‘made in l.a.’ at the ucla hammer museum,” for East Los Angeles Dirigible Air Transport Lines blog, September 7, 2014
“This entire display stinks of stupidity and an absent education. Has anyone here read a book or studied history or looked at a Botticelli or questioned a technique or patiently thought their way through an artistic conundrum? Not a chance. This is a generation of paint-happy know-nothings brought up on hamburgers and porn…”
—Waldemar Januszczak, “Don’t Want to Be an American Idiot,” review of “USA Today” at the Royal Academy of Arts, for Sunday Times (London), October 8, 2006
“Even if we could aside the unlikeliness of the plot, there was the issue of dire overacting—admittedly a recurrent trope in Breitz’s work, but one that hardly makes it easier to stomach. More than a few audience members voted with their feet and left the building.”
—Claire Bishop, “Trial and Error,” review of “New York, New York” at the Abrons Art Center, for Artforum (New York), November 27, 2009
“Genco I will kill you.”
—Twitter reply by a suspended account responding to Genco Gülan’s, Barıs (PEACE), September 7, 2015. Translated from Turkish by Cansu Bilgici
Follow Artnet News on Facebook:
Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward.