The Back Room
The Back Room: A Taste for the Finer Things
This week: everybody wins in auction week's sequel, the results of Art Basel’s solidarity fund, Giacometti meets the metaverse, and more.
This week: everybody wins in auction week's sequel, the results of Art Basel’s solidarity fund, Giacometti meets the metaverse, and more.
Tim Schneider ShareShare This Article
Every Friday, Artnet News Pro members get exclusive access to the Back Room, our lively recap funneling only the week’s must-know intel into a nimble read you’ll actually enjoy.
This week in the Back Room: everybody wins in auction week’s sequel, the results of Art Basel’s solidarity fund, Giacometti meets the metaverse, and more—all in a 7-minute read (1,995 words).
____________________________________________________________________________
Programming Note: The Back Room will be on hiatus next Friday for the Thanksgiving holiday but will return to help wrap up Art Basel Miami Beach the week after.
Last Friday, with two major New York evening sales down and five still to go, I framed this newsletter around an uncomfortable question burbling up around the business like a bad case of acid reflux: Is a critical mass of buyers deserting Modern and even postwar artists for talent that has emerged in the last 40 years?
But with the premier fall sales cycle now complete, it’s safe to say the results have settled an awful lot of stomachs around the industry, particularly at Christie’s, Sotheby’s, and Phillips.
A typhoon of cash flooded across the art-historical timeline in the Empire City’s auctions, showering millions on works by artists ranging from Vincent van Gogh and Gustave Caillebotte, to Avery Singer and Amy Sherald.
The Big Three houses amassed over $2 billion in combined sales even before Sotheby’s held its final two evening auctions Thursday. At times, it felt like the only pieces not selling were the ones not being offered.
In last week’s Back Room, I pegged two of this week’s auctions as especially useful indicators of whether buyers’ tastes have indeed changed in a market-moving way: Sotheby’s first bout with the postwar-white-dude-dominant Macklowe Collection, and the dependably ultra-current 20th century and contemporary evening sale at Phillips.
In retrospect, I feel pretty good about that call. Here’s how they fared. (Sales figures include the buyer’s premium; hammer prices and presale estimates do not.)
SOTHEBY’S: THE MACKLOWE COLLECTION
PHILLIPS: 20th CENTURY AND CONTEMPORARY EVENING SALE
____________________________________________________________________________
Between the Cox Collection and the Macklowe Collection, we should remember that most of the Modern and postwar works on offer in New York the past two weeks were of extraordinary quality and pedigree. A less heralded supply of oldies might have left the market with a narrower, more distressing perception of collectors’ preferences.
However, we have to evaluate based on what actually mounted the block. In the aggregate, results from the full evening slate strongly backed the perspective that Phillips deputy chairman Robert Manley offered during sales previews, when anxiety about the viability of older works seemed to peak: the story is “not so much taste change as taste expansion.”
Now it’s on the houses to keep consigning enough premium 19th and 20th century works to satisfy buyers’ newly broad palates.
This Week’s Full Sales Reports
____________________________________________________________________________
In the latest Wet Paint, Annie Armstrong checked in on a rocky art breakup more recent than Harry and Linda Macklowe’s: the split between Libbie and David Mugrabi, which somehow winds through a court filing to reopen the settled divorce case, the emergence of a lawsuit from a canned-pumpkin brand, and $125 trucker hats.
She also swims through the internet to surface another new reality of auction houses’ love affair with NFTs: when a crypto work fails to meet its reserve, a specialist like Christie’s digital-art czar Noah Davis may just take it straight to a different type of public forum: Discord.
Here’s what else made a mark around the industry since last Friday morning…
Art Fairs
Auction Houses
Galleries
Institutions
NFTs and More
____________________________________________________________________________
When Art Basel announced it would offer a portion of a $1.6 million “one-time solidarity fund” to all dealers who honored their prior commitment to exhibit at the fair this September, I called the initiative one of the most compelling social experiments in art-market history. Individual payouts would vary depending on how many dealers opted out of the fund—a choice each exhibitor would only have to make once the event ended.
How many galleries would really turn down free money regardless of their sales results and their choice’s impact on peers and rivals?
The answer, it turned out, was 175 of the 272 exhibitors, or nearly two-thirds. The split means a roughly 35 percent cost reduction for each of the 97 dealers who opted in.
Art Basel global director Marc Spiegler called the results a reflection of the “collegial” spirit among galleries at the fair. They’re also proof that the big auction houses weren’t the only ones able to generate a feel-good story this week.
____________________________________________________________________________
“This is the collection of a generation that’s passing—an old white man’s collection… Yes, these things are always going to be great, but is this what a young tech billionaire wants? I don’t think so.”
—Collector and Venus Over Manhattan gallerist Adam Lindemann on the future prospects of works from the Macklowe collection after their $676 million opening romp at Sotheby’s Monday night. (The New York Times)
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Sale Price: $78.4 million
Estimate: $70 million to $90 million
Sold at: Sotheby’s Macklowe Collection auction
How’s this for a counter-narrative? Hours after Adam Lindemann judged the Macklowe collection obsolete to the next generation of tech billionaires, Justin Sun, the Chinese-born 31-year-old tech billionaire behind web3 infrastructure company TRON and file-sharing network BitTorrent, took to Twitter to out himself as the winner of the megasale’s second-priciest lot.
The plot kept twisting from there. Sun announced he would donate Le Nez to his APENFT Foundation to enable “our community to have the opportunity to appreciate it through online and offline channels and get inspiration from it.” The foundation connects to a larger crypto venture that (according to its white paper) aims to register great artworks on the blockchain, as well as raise funds, make grants, and provide guidance to artists working to diversify culture as a part of the forthcoming metaverse.
In late October, APENFT launched the $100,000 Art Dream Fund to power this effort; the announcement included an estimate of more than $46 million for its collection, then led by works from Picasso, Warhol, Beeple, and Murat Pak (some of which you can see on the APENFT website). But Le Nez won’t be the only new addition driving up the collection’s value.
Sun also pledged that two of his other recent auction acquisitions would join the Giacometti in APENFT’s vaults and, soon after, on the blockchain: KAWS’s Untitled (Kimpsons) (2001), bought for HK$2.5 million ($323,647) from a Sotheby’s sale organized by Taiwanese pop star Jay Chou; and Pak’s Cube (2021), an NFT-backed digital work awarded to Sun for acquiring the most Open Edition cubes by the artist (priced at $1,500 each) during Sotheby’s first ever NFT auction in April. Looks like the metaverse just got a lot more blue-chip…
____________________________________________________________________________
Additional reporting and writing by Naomi Rea.